Of becoming a useless and harmful joke, discrediting worldwide efforts to moveĪway from this illusory “I came to the ND word from the Green Movement, the Narrative which ignores its complex Neurodivergence architecture, is in danger Mentioned?” because I genuinely believe that a Neurodiversity concept and
Restructuring the Neurodiversity narrative, I asked her: “ Unfortunately,Ĭurrent efforts, well-meaning as they are, seem too much about an integrative Progression of Neurodiversity from its “biodiversity” origins onto theĮmerging, umbrella concept for Neurodivergent conditions.Īpparently futile effort to clarify a vital segment of reassessing and Moved, prompted by what I have perceived as a theoretical threat to a desirable Other Neurodivergent conditions…” As a reply Singer condescendingly and literally Less autistic, but loud minority, which has become exclusive by ignorance, of Name, it has to move on from having come to actually represent only a more or To learning and as one might assume, debating, which resulted in my followingĬoncern: “Judy, with all due respect, but if ND is ever going to live up to its Herself, in a tweet I cannot access anymore, said that her article was meant asĪn “opening gambit” to be followed by more moves. Like Aspergers, Autism, ADHD, Dyslexia, Dyspraxia, etc.” Least belligerent term which comes to my mind, complex, motivated mainly as itĪppears, by Dr Nancy Doyle’s choice of describing “People with Neurodiversity” asīeing -in Singer’s words- “an assortment of people with a range of conditions I have only incidentally heard about Judy Singer, which is probably due to her two-decade long absence, which she succinctly describes as: “Returning to the field 20 years later”.Įrratically “clarified” in her article, these motives seem to be, using the
0 kommentar(er)
